Malawi case
The Applicant sought leave from the High Court to commence judicial review proceedings against the Malawi Electoral Commission regarding an election. The Court reviewed the application and its supporting documents and identified numerous irregularities, including typographical errors, wrong citations, and unclear arguments, concluding they were prepared in a hurry. Due to these procedural deficiencies, the Court dismissed the application. The Applicant was granted liberty to refile a properly drafted application, with the directive that any new proceedings for leave must be made with notice to the Respondent.
N/A
1. The Applicant, Mr. Madalitso Fred Kazombo has petitioned this court seeking permission to commence judicial review proceedings against the Malawi Electoral Commission in respect of its decision in relation to the just conducted election whose results we are still waiting. The application for leave is made pursuant to Order 19 rule 20, 21 and 22 as read with rule 13 and 19 of the Courts (High Court) (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter the CPR).
2. Upon going through the application, sworn statement verifying grounds for judicial review and the skeleton arguments in support of the application, the court noted a number of irregularities or errors in the manner in which the documents were prepared including typos, wrong citations of provisions in some respects, unclear arguments and compounding of facts among others. It would appear the application was done in a hurry and without proof such that in some respects, it is difficult to appreciate what Counsel intended to communicate to the court.
3. In this regard, the application cannot be granted. It is dismissed with liberty to refile a properly drafted application and supporting documents if the Applicant so wishes. If the Applicant decides to refile the judicial review proceedings, the application for leave should be made with notice to the Respondent.
4. It is so ordered.
Made in Chambers on 22nd day of September, 2025
Explore similar cases that share the same legal category, court, or judge. These cases may provide additional context and precedents relevant to this matter.
The 1st Claimant applied to the High Court (Commercial Division) to strike out the 1st Defendant’s notice of appeal or to vacate the order for stay of...
The Claimant applied to the High Court for an interlocutory injunction to prevent the Malawi Electoral Commission from announcing election results fo...
The Claimant, a legal practitioner, sought judicial review in the High Court, Principal Registry, challenging the decisions of the Defendants to arres...
The Claimant, a legal practitioner, sought judicial review in the High Court, Principal Registry, challenging the decisions of the Defendants to arres...
